Blog › Blog
Comparing hard money lenders on rate alone misses the variables that most affect whether your deal closes on time and at the terms you expected. Total financing cost, draw speed, reliability, and program fit for your specific deal matter more than being 50 basis points below market. Here is how to compare lenders the right way.
Rate is visible and easy to compare. It is also one of the least important variables for most deals.
On a $300,000 fix and flip held for 6 months, the difference between a 10% rate and an 11% rate is $1,500. On a deal with a $40,000 profit projection, $1,500 does not move the needle.
What does move the needle:
Rate optimization is the last thing to care about. Program fit, reliability, and speed come first.
Before comparing any terms, confirm each lender can actually fund your deal:
| Factor | Lender A | Lender B | Lender C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licensed in your state? | |||
| Funds your deal type? | |||
| Loan size in range? | |||
| LTC available for your experience? | |||
| Credit score acceptable? |
Any lender with a "No" in this table is eliminated before comparing anything else.
Do not compare rates. Compare total cost over your projected hold period.
Inputs needed:
Calculate total cost for your specific loan amount and projected hold period on each lender. The lender with the lowest rate is frequently not the lender with the lowest total cost.
Ask each lender: "What is your typical timeline from a complete application to close?"
Then ask: "Can you give me an example of a comparable deal you closed recently and how long it took?"
The stated timeline and the actual timeline are sometimes different. Lenders who can cite a recent example credibly are more reliable than those who give a range without specifics.
If your deal has a contract closing deadline, this question is critical. A lender who cannot close by your deadline is not a viable lender for this deal regardless of their terms.
For renovation loans, compare:
A lender whose draw timeline is 7 days costs you real money in contractor carrying costs compared to one who wires in 2 days. This is a material operational difference.
A lender with a rigid no-extension policy on a renovation loan is a risk if your project timeline is uncertain.
After gathering this information, you should be able to fill in a comparison that looks like:
| Lender A | Lender B | |
|---|---|---|
| Rate | 10.5% | 11% |
| Points | 2.5 | 1.5 |
| Interest type | Non-Dutch | Dutch |
| Total cost (7 months, $300K) | ~$27,000 | ~$22,500 |
| Close timeline | 14-18 days | 10-12 days |
| Draw speed (request to wire) | 5-7 days | 2-3 days |
| Extension available | Yes, 1.5 pts | Yes, 1 pt |
| References available | Yes | Yes |
In this example, Lender A has a lower rate. Lender B costs $4,500 less in total financing, closes 4-6 days faster, and funds draws twice as fast. The right choice is obvious when the comparison is complete.
Getting comparable quotes from multiple lenders used to require submitting to each one separately, waiting for responses, and manually comparing whatever came back.
Broker Cheetah's quote request system sends your deal to matched lenders simultaneously and returns structured quote responses — rate, points, LTC, term, draw structure — in a consistent format for direct comparison. No repeat data entry. No chasing multiple AEs for the same information.
Verify your email and receive 5 free Credits. Use one for a real residential lender search or one quote-request batch to as many as four lenders. No card required.
Try It Free →